Home

Jason Bourne

1 Comment

**½

Why would he come back now?

jason-bourne-dialoghi.jpg

And why did I come back to watch this? From the trailer and the cast/crew list there were a lot of checked boxes that I look for in movies.

  1. Is it directed or written by Paul Greengrass? Yes and yes, so that is +2 (and besides Green Zone has he put out a non-excellent movie before?)
  2. Is this part of the Bourne Trilogy? Kind of. Same world, but it is a number greater than three…
  3. Does this sequel have the original cast still? Matt Damon and Julia Stiles, seems like enough to me. +1.

And what did I learn from this fifth installment? Well, it seems like the CIA is still full of a-holes. Even with so many prior elements returning in microwavable form, it just did not feel the same, like a reheated slice of pizza. And just like microwaved pizza being consumed alone in sweatpants, it was a bit depressing. To be candid I did watch this on a plane so the audio was only so-so, but I do not think the issue was the audio. I never thought I would say this, but Vincent Cassel disappointed me with his performance as another “asset”. I adore Vincent Cassel, so this was even more disappointing than his role in Oceans 13. Lastly One Take Tommy (Lee Jones) dour faced his way through this one, resulting in unlikable, but uncompelling villains (when you include Cassel).

I will say that there was one particular shot that was really cool. One of the most memorable shots in the original, The Bourne Identity, was when Bourne is walking away from the camera and a minibus cuts off our view of him and he disappears. In this one a bus or tram blocks our view of him and when it has moved he is still visible and the CIA agents spot him. Returning to my pizza analogy, even reheated pizza is pizza, and everyone likes pizza.

Considering all of the above, does this mean that it is time for a reboot? I just do not know. If Greengrass was attached, or even better, if some other writer/director whom I respected had a new take on the subject, then I would be right back in there. For 14 years Jason Bourne has been as much James Bond as James Bond has been, and we already have a George Lazenby (Jeremy Renner). The question is, who will be the Roger Moore?1

1 With his recent passing I expect to write something about the late Roger Moore.

Advertisements

Logan

2 Comments

***½

As I live and breathe, “the Wolverine”.

dailymotion_k2Aauy2ecbaVTTluaK7.jpg

Finding a quotation without lots of profanity was difficult. I am not sure why it is so pervasive here, but it certainly is. Maybe just to show this was not the same world, not at all the same world as the other X films. At least it is not thematically the same world. Instead of being meta and satisfying, as many reviewers have proposed, I just found it a bit confusing. It is still a good movie and a fitting swan song for Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine.

The only other thought I have is that this was not an adaptation of “Old Man Logan” as you may have read. The upcoming Thor movie with Thor facing the Hulk seems to have as much in common with that story as this did—at least that has villain Hulk fighting. Tying things up with the Hulk was a fitting idea since Wolverine’s first appearance was in Incredible Hulk #181. Last thought, it is funny to go online and read crybaby rightwingers who think this movie filmed before the 2016 election was an indictment of Trump and Republicans because future US is a corporate garbage state where people have fewer rights than corporations.

Sisters

Leave a comment

***

What fresh fuckery is this?

sisters-2015-kate-ellis-pazuzu-drug-dealer-john-cena-tina-fey-review

Kate Ellis (Tina Fey) & Pazuzu (John Cena), in Sisters, 2015.

I know, I know, it bothers some people when I use, or quote, profanity. But that quote is amazing because it parallels something Boromir says—in Fellowship of the Ring, obviously—”What is this new devilry?” But I never quote it correctly! I always say, “What new devilry is this?” I like to think that screenwriter Paula Pell thought that too.

So this movie was better than I expected. Certainly it was unrealistic but it was consistent in this level of unrealism. Best part of the movie — doot doodoo dooo, John Cena! His tattooed drug dealing TSA Agent was wonderful.  Also, I was impressed that Tina Fey showed a hitherto unseen acting range.

your name

1 Comment

Context is everything. I have been extremely lax this year in keeping up with “good” movies. It has been a busy 365 days for me, but that is just an excuse. While flying to and from my honeymoon I had a combined 48 hours of air time. I tried to watch Spotlight, but turned it off after 10 minutes. I did, however, rewatch Independence Day. Since I was on Japan Airlines the choices were better than on any American carrier, but also included lots of non-classic Japanese films. Spotting this on in the row ahead of me I kept paying attention to it. I could tell it was a teenage body swap anime, and that it was drawn well. I used to love watching animes, but stopped for no good reason about 8 years ago. In fact, the only anime I remember watching since I started this blog was when I rewatched Ghost in the Shell in order to confirm its 5-Star Status.1  That is the sole anime in my 13 years of film reviewing to get 5 stars.

Treasure the experience. Dreams fade away after you wake up.

FOUR MONTHS LATER — So I got writers block for the first time ever. Reviewer’s block? To overcome this I am getting back to basics with (1) Ratings, (2) Quotations, & (3) Other.

(3) Other: this was a beautiful film. I cared so deeply about these characters that I was basically crying and begging an already finished film to provide me with the ending I wanted. To evoke that emotion genuinely, without resorting to musical or cultural shortcuts, is amazing. Pan’s Labyrinth does it well. This does it even better.

*****

Did I forget to say what the movie was about? That was not part of the original formula. And no pictures. Here is the phonetic Japanese of the title (Kimi no na wa).

your-name-anime

Taki & Mitsuha, your name.

1 The Ghost in the Shell remake starring the oh-so-white Scarlett Johansson is about to be released, and as much as I dislike whitewashing I am excited for this film. As for other animated films, the only I also gave 5 Stars was Frozen, which I now regret. This is a review of first impressions, thus barring exceptional circumstances, that score stays put forever. I have similar feelings about Supertroopers and The Departed.

Pitch Perfect 2

Leave a comment

***

Listen, I don’t want you guys to fight. You’re Beca and Chloe, together you’re Bhloe and everyone loves a good Bhloe.

pp2

Rebel Wilson & Anna Kendrick in Pitch Perfect 2, © 2012 Universal Pics.

So this movie was not bad. I went into it with very low expectations and they were exceeded. I did get sick of the fat jokes pretty quickly. And I would say that it had trouble getting out of its own way when it came to telling a tight narrative story. But the characters were solid. Anna Kendrick was excellent reprising her role as Beca, now the leader of the acapella team the Barton Bellas. Unsurprisingly Elizabeth Banks and John Michael Higgins return to skewer our society’s sexism, racism, and ignorance through seemingly inane commentary. Surprisingly Banks directed this, which was her first feature film. What she lacked in experience she overcame with a great sense of humor. She also cast David Cross, which is always a good idea.

Pitch Perfect

Leave a comment

***

Wanna do something else? We could re-live my parents’ divorce. Or visit a gynecologist.

So this was Jason Moore’s first time directing a movie. That surprised me because this movie seemed really competently put together. The music was good. The acting was good. I was interested in these college students even, if none looked college aged. The story comes from a Mickey Rapkin book that probably has the same name. I want to know if the jokes in that are as bad as they were here. Reading the movie quotes got pretty painful. Moore’s second movie, Sisters, is funnier, so clearly he has a sense of humor, or at least would eventually grow into having one.

Pitch-Perfect-pitch-perfect-31502074-1200-847.jpg

Rebel Wilson in the original Barton Bellas uniforms, in Pitch Perfect (2012).

Anna Kendrick starred as the first year college woman who hesitates before joining her school’s team and innovating them to victory. Rebel Wilson co-starred in a role, “Fat Amy”, that was both a criticism of Mean Girls culture and a contributor thereto, by having her still go for cheap laughs as an unsexy, big girl. Still, she at times she had sex appeal in the movie, even as it sent up the idea of her being sexy at other times. The most consistently funny part of the movie came from the announcing duo of Gail and John, played as whitely as possible by Elizabeth Banks and John Michael Higgins. Maybe that is why she got an opportunity to direct her first movie with Pitch Perfect 2.

Hail, Caesar!

1 Comment

**½

Hail, Caesar! is a collection of cute moments from talented actors. Maybe it would be best viewed as an extended episode of “Mr. Show with Bob and David”, but those always made me laugh far more than this did. Still, with a cast this stacked, there were bound to be some highlights. I thought that the kind of “in the Navy” Channing Tatum singing and dancing number was delightful. It fits into the story as a glimpse into the action on the set of Capitol Pictures with its executive and fixer Eddie Mannix—Josh Brolin. Brolin is fine as the slightly exasperated but always within control Mannix. There was also a powerful speech where George Clooney, in character, forgets the final words, which makes for a slight laugh, and skewers the idea of the validity of emotion within film, but for what? I was left with several questions when the film ended.

hail-caesar-george-clooney.jpg

Clancy Brown and George Clooney playing actors playing Romans in Hail, Caesar!

By having Clooney’s character agree with his communist abductors—yes, one problem Mannix faces is that Clooney gets drugged and abducted by non-threatening communist screenwriters—I figured that perhaps the directors were presenting them in a positive light, but they became so farcical and inept that I wondered why take this shot at communism?

With the negative portrayals of sniveling screenwriters, condescending directors, cowardly or dimwitted actors, was this an indictment of the film industry? I do not see the self-criticism herein, which makes me wonder if I missed something.

One part of the Hollywood film industry that never seems to make it into movies are the investors. Well in this one Eddie Mannix calls New York every day to give them updates. We, the audience, never get to actually hear “the money” speak. Does this represent the disconnect between financing art and creating it? Without hundreds of millions of dollars our film industry would be nothing like how it is now, nor how it was in the 1950’s. But they get no credit in creating the art, does their perceived financial desire totally remove their connection to the art created? The art that legally they have a greater claim to ownership over than the cast or crew.

But the most important question of them all is why choose Eddie Mannix as the hero, of all people?! Eddie Mannix was a real person who was portrayed as a villain in Hollywoodland. Therein the late Bob Hoskins portrayed him with a tender menace. For those who have not seen this gem, it is a biopic of George Reeves (Superman). Who tries to make a cuddly flic like this about a guy whom many believe is a murderer?

tatum2.png

Channing Tatum as Burt Gurney and co singing that “No Dames” number.

Unfortunately when taken as a whole, this day in the life of Eddie Mannix just does not satisfyingly fit together. Oddly it felt more like a lesser Wes Anderson film than a Coen Brothers movie. I leave you you all with the highlight of the film, the words to that Navy song:

We are heading out to sea and however it will be, it ain’t gonna be the same. cause no matter what we see, when we’re out there on the sea, we ain’t gonna see a dame. we’ll be searching high and low on the deck and down below but it’s a crying shame. Oh, we’ll see a lot of fish but we’ll never clock a dish. We ain’t gonna see a dame. No dames! we might see some octopuses No dames! or a half a dozen clams No dames! we might even see a mermaid But mermaids got no gams! No gams! Have I got a girl for you! out there on the sea! Here’s how it will be i’m gonna dance with you, pal you’re gonna dance with me! When we’re out there on the sea we’ll be happy as can be Or so the Captain claims! But we have to disagree. Cause the only guarantee Is I’ll see a lot of you And you’ll see a lot of me! And it’s absolutely certain That we’ll see a lot of sea. But we ain’t gonna see no dames. No dames! We’re going to sea! No dames! We’re going to sea! No dames! We’re going to sea! We ain’t gonna see no Dames!

Older Entries Newer Entries